[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[ao16aprs] Re: packet qrm on fo-20/fo-29
- To: "TAPR AO-16 APRS Special Interest Group" <ao16aprs@lists.tapr.org>
- Subject: [ao16aprs] Re: packet qrm on fo-20/fo-29
- From: Bob Bruninga <bruninga@nadn.navy.mil>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:46:21 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <LYR862-37380-1999.08.31-05.45.18--BRUNINGA#NADN.NAVY.MIL@lists.tapr.org>
- List-Owner: <mailto:owner-ao16aprs@lists.tapr.org>
- List-Software: Lyris Server version 3.0
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:subscribe-ao16aprs@lists.tapr.org>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:leave-ao16aprs-833L@lists.tapr.org>
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Jeff Griffin wrote:
> Good morning group. Several user's mentioned packet noise on FO-20 on our
> morning net we have on FO-20. looking at the frequencies for AO-16/LO-19,
> 145.900 would be better. Most people use 145.920/145.950 on the FO bird's
> for an U/L. If we can, we might want to move the U/L to 145.900, this would
> solve the problem. Also several noticed 1200 baud packet on AO-27. I haven't
> heard this, but just passing it along.
Keep an ear on FO20. I dont think 145.90 is an option, since it is shared
by about 6 or moer satellites. 145.94 is used by no other (other than
FO-20 which of course listens to half the band...
---
You are currently subscribed to ao16aprs as: lyris.ao16aprs@tapr.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-ao16aprs-833L@lists.tapr.org